So everyones crying about supergerms and shit. I personnally have been seeking out non-anti-bacterial soap and avoid antibiotics (yes no hyphens, I just like typing that word, hyphens) so that I don’t encourage the supergerm.
See, as you might know, evolution is premised, at least lately, on survival of the fittest. So everyone is trying real hard like to pass on there genes. From the southern bell debutant all the way down to the e-coli coming out of her ass. But if you die before you procreate than you’re genes, which may resisit AIDS, cancer or other population modulators, don’t live on in the form of a progeny. So, of late, antibiotics and antibacterial soap have come under fire. If you kill off all of the bacteria that is suceptable to anti-bacterial soap then, the bacteria that can resist your anti-bacterial-ism will survive and have no competition. The bacteria that survived anti-bacerial-ism are going to be resistant to anti-biotics that have been developed and a certain part of the human population will die off because their immune systems and our anti-biotics can’t protect them.
I bought into this theory for a while but then I realized that the theory is in fact another manifestation of survival of the fittest. If the supergerm can survive my anti-bacterial soap then it is strong. And let’s say, I can’t fight that bacteria, then I am weak. And the winner is……..the bacteria. Which kills me and my weak genes. Ultimately, this is good for the human waste (I mean race). Then we build a superhuman that is immune to the bacteria which is immune to the anti-bacterial soap that we developed and we get to develop more anti-bacterial products which will make another person rich (more than probably a anglo-pharmaceutical heir) who can afford more medical care to advance their weak genes.